leica m240 vs m262 image quality

For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually built-in. Source: DxOMark. I will stick with my film Leica for now. Ive had it for a month now. CIPA is an independent, standard measurement that determines how many shots a camera can take before the battery dies. Value for money, incredible quality. M262 is simple M240 less some features not necessary to still picture but in M240, those features can be ignored. For a start, the battery in the M262 was a lot bigger than that in the M9. Focusing that close without rangefinder coupling is of course quite difficult unless you have live-view. Find a comparison between different fujifilm x30 vs x100t. Any help you learned people would be able to give me as to M240 vs M262 and a good lenswould be invaluable and very much appreciated. Can you advice,please, if you still own both cameras: why some people says that m262 perform better colors? Got a spare lottery ticket? Its a good thing to have for visually challenged oldsters like me. I currently shoot with a Fuji X-Pro2 and love it. The M Typ 240 can record in Full HD at 24, 25 or 30fps. For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. That said, Ive sometimes found that shooting in high contrast situations the exposure prefers to underexpose slightly, yet have always found the shadows to have plenty enough detail in them when pulled out in post. The smaller file size also allows quicker read/write speeds. Other new features include an expanded ISO range of 100 to 50000, 16 minute maximum exposure time, dynamic range equivalent of 13.5 stops, an on-screen level gauge, and super quiet . I think everyone gave great suggestions, I went with a new 262, love the shutter and simplicity compared to the 240. Thanks. Functionalism be damned. Hello Hamish,Great writeup. Nice write-up. You can post now and register later. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. I do think the 262 files have an edge over the 240. I'm not sure if it's ok to show a snapshot of the LFI article. This made me think; maybe I could get on with the video features too? Yet all the buttons on it and the LCD still have me pining for Leicas. Can you let me know where you heard that the sensor uses different technology? The following dropbox link to a small group of images hopefully illustrate these subtle but apparent colour densities. Ultimately I hope that the dial on the M10 will give me a greater sense of being in control and connected to the ISO settings Im using. Phase-detection autofocus is much faster than a contrast detection autofocus, allowing for sharper images. If you intend to use lenses wider than 28mm or longer than 135mm Liveview and EVF are very useful, also macro photography is much easier (essential with the new 90mm macro lens and macro adapter) or if you need video. In fact, for this very reason the Leica M262 has actually presented me with the least inspiration so far. You cannot paste images directly. As an M10 owner I should say that yes, this camera is definitely a less is more sort of gadget. Leica M Typ 240. A stereo microphone allows to record audio files or movies in stereo without an external microphone. BudfoxJuly 7, 2016 in Leica M (Type 240 / 262). The M240 feels, well, fuller. I missed his musings in AP. if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_12',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); As it turned out, I would find more advantages with the Leica M262 when I got it. The M10 has the new ISO wheel on the top left. In the real world, I was making the M9 work for me in terms of low light shooting, as such, I have literally never found a single issue with high ISO noise from the M262. If you dont plan to use ur leica more than that range of focal lengths then M262 is right for you. And thats pushing it. For the M240, forget it. In fact, I pressed the LV (for live-view) button on the camera before I even took a photo. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. The M240 is a great camera that produces gorgeous images but you are undoubtedly going to love the M10. Bear in mind I have not held or shot an M10, my information comes from extensive reading of user experiences. I can get focus on a defined distance or subject and with a remote release or the self timer, get stealthy images while at the same time getting real time information on exposure. They were taken about a minute apart as I only had one tripod and needed to put the . I would still rather have the m10 over all the others though, but I definitely see you point. Theres been a couple of times when Ive picked the camera up one after using it in lower light and ended up shooting a whole loads of frames at a high ISO before twigging that the chosen shutter speed seems too high. The model omits the Typ 240's live view and video capabilities, and has a much simpler menu structure and one-button access to . With AF tracking, once you choose the subject and press the shutter release part way down, as the subject moves, the autofocus will follow it. As mentioned, one of the big selling points Leica hung their marketing angle off when launching the Leica M262 was the reduction of menu options to 2 screens compared to the M240. Ive tried all of the digital M types and my heartfelt favorites are the M8 and M9-P (equally), then the Typ 262 in that order. I bought it as temporary replacement camera after my M262 had to pay a little trip to Germany for some repair work. Thanks for posting, enjoyed the images. The firmware adds 6-bit code support and correction profiles for new lenses . Of course with these features comes a fairly significant increase in menu options too, though I must admit, I was surprised how simple the menu remains given the extra features on offer. Just experimenting, I took a bunch of photos of my mates Canon AE1 this was fun with a rangefinder; I could get used to this! has a removable battery. A fetish with the M10 is its simplified menu. No. All other things aside, they, Leica M cameras, are unique. We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. Great pictures and very interesting. Intro Sample Images Lenses Specs Performance. To be honest, I think I shared those views and though I might not been inclined to articulate them quite as vociferously as some it was those views that swayed me toward the M262. Ha!Have you ever read my Fuji X100f review I think you might enjoy it.https://www.35mmc.com/14/10/2017/fuji-x100f-fuji-lost-sight-elegant-original-concept/. Our camera evaluations and conclusions are based . Learn how your comment data is processed. Survey: Third-party Lenses for Leica M-Mount , Umfrage: Dritthersteller Objektive fr Leica M-Mount . We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. I know youre right, I often talk about the bullshit involved in the upgrade path but it has an iso dial! It was the third major iteration of colour digital Leica M . Plus it's lighter. The color profile is quite different too, with more electric blues and purer reds. Of all the mentioned digital rangefinders, I enjoyed the [], [] is a definite yes! I have found that the shadows in the M10 can be pulled forever, which is great, because both cameras have about the same capacity to blow highlight details. I have a X113 and an M262. You can post now and register later. I know thats not a crime, I also know it has nothing to do with how much skill I have as a photographer. Any chance youre planning to do a write up on that Nokton 50mm f/1.2? (Leica M (Typ 262)), Unknown. Both were taken at 3200 ISO to try and exaggerate any image quality issues. JPG Settings can be on the user assignable first screen and from that quickly turn on/off Monochrome. That said, even in the short time Ive owned a Leica M240, its confused me with what seems like an obvious short coming, changed my mind about one feature that I had written of as pretty much useless to me, proved that another one of its highlight features is indeed something I have no interest in, and perhaps unfortunately (since I cant afford one) left me with big a chunk of Leica M10 GAS. I took the M240 because it offeres live view. The Leica M (Typ 262) is a digital rangefinder camera announced by Leica Camera on November 19, 2015. I dont have and 6-bit coded lenses, or really bother with the coding, so just tend to set the minimum speed to 1/60th. Personally, I tire of the constant whining about Leica prices. Thank you @Jeff Sfor this and also your sage comments re not having to use video and not having to use LV on the M240. This was a heretical change from earlier Leicas. Indeed, I am an m10 owner who misses my m9. Bluetooth is a wireless technology that allows you to easily transfer data between different devices, such as smartphones, tablets and computers. Its funny, the M262 seems to be the Leica camera that people forget. Waiting for the fishy in the little dishy by Gil Aegerter, Lava Lizard on Marine Iguana by ZimmWisdom. As I talk about in my M9 review, the screen on that camera really is very crap, so this did feel like a big enough deal to make the jump. The M240 is a camera where perhaps 50% of the image is created in camera, 50% in computer. The overall user interface of the Leica M262 turned out to be a bigger upgrade than I expected too though its still not been quite the perfect experience. Both should arrived this coming week and so I am getting very excited! Ive read all too often from M10 owners how much they miss an M9 or M8 variant because of the simplicity and CCD image quality. Thirty days, a new sensor, a new shutter mechanism, and a couple other tweaks and the camera was better than new. Its still inaccurate, but at least the photos look pleasant enough. The shutter and cocking mechanism are much quieter than in the earlier and higher-priced M Typ 240, and allow two frames per second to be recorded in single shot mode. Another M10 fetish. Expanded ISO allows you to go beyond the native ISO. Same settings, same ISO of 320, etc. This never really bothered me about the M9, but having the issue taken away made me appreciate the issue for what it was. To a degree, I can see their point too. If you half press the shutter to leave the menu without pressing SET the ISO remains what it was set to before. Without looking, apart from the lens detection options, I couldnt tell you whats in the menu at all. Given my choice to upgrade to the M10, possibly the most pertinent issue with the ISO settings is the inability to set or see the chosen ISO without pressing a button and looking at the back of the camera. Using it in this factory, a space where I needed to be aware of the timing of things that were happening around me, it just clicked for me. The Leica M [typ 262], or M262 for short offers what's best described as a stripped-back user interface. . You can click any image for a larger view which is the best way to view it as this site compresses these down to what you see below . I dont need such features on my Leica rangefinders these are real cameras that I use properly, I dont need live-view with my real cameras! Cant quite stretch to the Summicron or Summilux at the moment All the best and, no doubt, I will be on here again soon with myriad questions! It is certainly one of the most economical full frame digital Leica M cameras out there, however, still a very expensive camera, even used. Every other brand talks about new improved this, and added or increased that. All features aside, my lust was triggered by the drastic reduction in size. Leica claims it uses different technology, whatever that means. And thats pushing it. Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, Leica M6 Classic & Leica M6 TTL A Review of Both Variants, Leica M8 (Finally) Falling in love with this aging digital By Taffy Ledesma, Leica IIf Red Dial: Nostalgia, or Tool for Serious Storytelling? I didnt have the energy to get into the subtleties of all that here though, LV is useful even if the screen does not move. It leaves me with no desire whatsoever to upgrade at all and will be my sole digital camera for hopefully many years to come., [] a moment to reflect on this previous style of photography of mine. without having to transfer the images to the computer first. Jordan's twin brother Gordon is back to review the cinema-focused Canon EOS R5 C! A raw image file contains minimally processed data from the image sensor. So the M262 is going to stay, and the Leica M240 go. Im used to focus peaking from shooting video with the Sony cameras, so it was such a short leap to press the LV button and take photos in a way that felt familiar. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. I just bought a M262.Its my 3rd Leica M (after a M6 and a M240) and each time I come back to a M, its a delight. Bringing up the live-view display gave me what appeared to my taste to be a quite unpleasant representation of the world in front of the camera. The fix is to remove the bottom plate and remove the battery, but this is not a solution for when the decisive moment is at hand.Low Light Performance. When it comes to making video, things are different! And given the choice between keeping the M262 and the M240, despite what the Leica M240 brings to the table, it doesnt win out over M262. Leica M262 - "A Leica M240 in a Leica M9 body" The Leica M 262 that Leica Camera AG surprisingly introduced November 2015 is basically a Leica M 240 in a Leica M9 body. Its back to the basics. I just dont shoot it at that high ISO for it to be a problem, and often wonder what on earth people are doing with their cameras to need the sorts of high ISOs that get spoken about it reviews. A personal taste thing of course, but youd think that a Leica camera would have a screen that was at least mostly accurate to the end photo? Otherwise, the two cameras are similar since the 262 is really just a pared-down version of the 240 and if its mainly the rangefinder experience that you are after then you cant go wrong with either. Help us by suggesting a value. Im really glad I ordered it, the best Leica M camera Ive ever used! Now, Im writing this after my M262 has come back from Germany (it only took a couple of months!! Really thats been the beauty of the Leica M262 for me for the most part, its done almost exactly what Ive needed it to. A device's overall image quality score considers: color depth, dynamic range and low light performance. I have a Fuji X100f and stripped down the OVF/EVF data and shoot in manual with manual focus only to give it a M2 feel. The 262 probably has a more stable power management, resulting in less banding and thus better high ISO performance. I drive a 15 year old car for example, dont buy clothes often, have one pair of shoes, etc. It was designed and released after the M240 to offer an option to photographers who didnt need the bells and whistles the M240 had to offer. Of course, Id skipped the M240 and gone from M9 to M262 though surprisingly, the menu system of the M262 is even more stripped back than that of the M9. I dont mind adjusting contrast, thats just part of the process of me. Very nice work. Hey all, I've owned an M6 for several years and in the next few months will be unloading a few of my higher-end film cameras to (downsize and) purchase a digital Leica to compliment my M6. BTW the battery life of a charge is awesome. More microphones result in better sound quality and enable the device to filter out background noise. While I am relatively new to the Leica world, I have done the exact same thing as you: I am selling my M262 (although not for another digital M!). The fact that Ive somehow managed to rationalise my way out of that opinion doesnt change how good the M262 really is, and indeed how well suited to me I once felt it to be. Quite possibly because my camera at the time didnt have it as a feature, I denied that I would ever find it useful. Afternoon all and best wishes for a happy 2021! Continue with Recommended Cookies. However it is nice to have a brand new camera and if you can manage without Liveview most M262 users seem very happy with it. The top plate of the M262 feels slightly more hollow than the M240 not it a way that you can feel it, but you can sort of hear it if you tap it, and even sometimes when the strap rattles on it. So as I said in the first few paragraphs, now its on its way out, I thought I should do it the justice of writing a few parting words about it. The Digital Leica M Samples Gallery (Any digital M from M8 to M-D 262) Below are all images taken with a digital Leica M from the 240 to the m_P to the M-D, the latest and greatest M Rangefinders from Leica Camera. Personally Id always choose an M without video capability, but thats personal preference. Last year I got the 262 and had been quite pleased with it. These were features I wanted to explore whilst I had this camera though I really had very low expectations that they would do much for me. Mostly because I wanted to shoot below 0.7m and Id have to use Live View for that. Funnily enough, when searching to find out if I was the only one to notice this, I found this post on a forum where someone finds the same issue, but prefers the cooler screen of his Leica M240 to the later M-P version of the M240 which seems to have the same warmer screen as my M262. As cboy pointed out above, that may limit lens choice. Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water. I guess its only really there as it was the most logical thing for Leica to put there in place of the LV live view button on the M240. Theres very little real difference between the two cameras so it really depends on what you can find to suit your budget - I certainly wouldnt hold out for one if you can find the other in decent condition. homestead high school staff. Whilst I fully get that it is down to personal preference, I just thought I would ask the question: M240 (or its E and P variants) or M262? Since most reviews are quite large in content thanks to extensive coverage, comparisons to other cameras and large sample images, they span across multiple pages for easier reading experience. I wish I could afford him moreI often find myself agreeing with him too. That said, the real joy is in how little even the two screens of options in the main menu need to be used. My guess is that many of the Leica purists won't be bothered at all by this decision. It's slightly lighter than the 240 and I have no use for video nor live view in a Leica. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. Using the right SD card is key here. With the M262 even going away for a long weekend I would debate the need to even take the charger for a single battery. Its based on the body of the M240, but as Ive said, when it was released it was pitched as a more affordable stripped-back camera with less features. Be the first. Of course Im now retired and not doing imaging for a living. The M240 is a bit slow on the uptake, but I generally leave the camera on while on photo walks so not a real issue.Lock-ups. Menu. I decided that I wanted to keep the one camera that can do close to everything I need in the digital world (and for me, this includes personal and occasional professional work, mostly product still photography, but also videography). 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. It usesa 24-megapixel CMOS sensor, a Maestro image processor witha near-silent shutter, and a quiet shutter-cocking motor. Early M3 models featured a double-stroke lever, meaning it required two strokes to advance to the next frame of film and cock the shutter. The better the dynamic range the system captures a wider number of values from dark to light leading to more details in low and highlights. Whats cool about having a Z6 (or other similar mirrorless camera) is that I can easily adapt the Leica M glass. The LEICA M typ 240 is the world's second full-frame mirrorless camera. I posted this as a person of experience. This is particularly useful on long shoots when you need more space. By There are no 'Landscape', 'Sport', or 'Smile Detection' modes. Cheers! So I still have ways to go to become a true minimalist! Your previous content has been restored. Most of the digital M bodies are going to offer a satisfactory experience for the average first time Leica user. My budget is c. 3,000 for the camera and lens. I love the colors from the sensor as a whole, but one thing I dont like is rendering of skin tones. A simple exterior is my kind of camera- adverts belong on billboards, not on cameras. Anyone have both that could provide a side by side? If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. LV is handy for confirming RF calibration. It tells you : take your time, have fun with the manual focus, enjoy the concepts small is beautiful and less is more, listen to the music made by the shutter, look how discret you are when shooting and readily agreed, leave the arm race to the geek and feel free to take pictures your way.Shooting with the M262 is as simple and as pleasant as a walk in the forest in summer. It was mentioned in LFI first issue of 2016. as first digital Leica M, I'd take M (typ 262) but if the M (typ240) is cheaper, go ahead. I too prefer the more stripped back feature set of the M9, M240, and M10. Thanks a lot for all your helpful comments. With some apprehension, I took the memory card out of the camera and put it into the computer. The build quality of the M 262 is impeccable. Lastly, its kind of neat that these two are sort of a match- but different enough to stand out on my desk when I go to grab one for a shoot. I did find a custom LR preset that helps a lot, but it would be nice to have natural skin tones straight from the camera. An electronic viewfinder (EVF) with a higher resolution provides a sharper image, producing a view comparable in quality with the one displayed on an optical viewfinder. The Leica M262 (and M240 or any other current M as of July of 2016) seems more like a bridge between the past and what could be the future of Leica. That, in my opinion, is the Leica M 240's motto. I have purchased an M262 and, given my budget, a Voigtlander Ultron 35mm (which I have read is actually a really good lens). Yeah, I edit all my digital images, so I guess I dont really think about that. Image quality will be essentially the same. Yes, the image quality of the Leica M (type 240) is a step down from the Leica M9. I was wondering if you ever ended up upgrading to the M10? I didn't do any critical tests, but I feel the M262 may have around one stop advantage at high iso. Using an M this way does not give me the same fundamental photography pleasure as the M8 or M-9P do, but, what it does give me is the ability to scratch the inevitable itch that eventually comes to every M8/9/ME user the desire to use their M for other tasks theirs just cannot do (macro work, adapting other lenses for example). All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. For system cameras, having a focus motor in the camera's body allows you to use a wide range of lenses, including lenses which do not have their own focus motor. Great review as always, I look forward to the M10 review I think the slimmer body size alone is a reason to upgrade, feel like a proper M body. The colour differences between the two are due to slightly different colour handling in the camera and can be cancelled out completely by the camera profiles in LR. At 0.68 magnification itll be hard to push to 75mm without a magnifier eyepiece x1.25 or x1.4. Versus uses cookies to improve your experience on the site. Then I bought an early mirrorless camera possibly a Panasonic or Sony, I cant remember which came first and I had to eat a load of humble pie. Yes, the M240s menu is busier, but once I have the camera set up to my liking I dont really venture into the menu often. Possibly Leica got the Bayer filter from a different supplier making the change needed. This is exiting news in so many ways that I will now test your patience for a few minutes in trying to explain it. Adjusting colours always feels like a headache, but is one Ive broadly avoided with this camera. The number of megapixels determines the resolution of the images captured with the main camera. Even when recording scenes with a lot of fast movements, the videos are sharp and clear. Fortunately, whilst the control of ISO isnt quite perfect, I have found the way exposure compensation works on the Leica M262 to be a big step up from the M9. Thank you for it. I like them nice and simple, low tech, etc. The WB white balance button is completely redundant by my measure. I so rarely hit the menu button on this camera, it practically doesnt need to be there for my purposes, and Id imagine most users find the same. All photographs and text appearing on 35mmc.com are the exclusive property of the named author (except where stated otherwise) and are protected by copyright. Now, I should just say at this point that when I first got my Leica M262 I found the exact opposite. Have a read of this for tips. Don't be one of those people who blows their budget on a body and can barely afford to buy a lens or two. I had recently bought a Nikon 50mm f/2 LTM lens and had mounted it on the M240. I am including these 2 images taken from the same spot focusing on the same scene. You shouldnt be so hard on yourself, Pera. The beauty of the Leica M262 is what they took away.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_16',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); That being said, even with major Leica models the upgrade path involves such small incremental changes. A larger sensor will capture more light, which results in improved low-light performance, dynamic range, and general image quality. I think it is a very cool and stripped down digital M camera that I purchased used to compliment my M3 (I use the M3 with a 50mm and 90mm lens). Well worth seeking out. A higher screen resolution provides a sharper image, making it easier to review your photos. This might sound like a small criticism, and Im sure many wouldnt even notice or care, but actually it goes back to what I was saying earlier about familiarity. This happens with the M240 from time to time.

Willie Randolph Wife Gretchen, Articles L